Acer Aspire Z3-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire Z3-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z3-710
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 88
2-Core 161
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 304
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Acer(1025 101F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 6.66
3% 5.77 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.78
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 414 381 401 402 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 453
Write 399
Mixed 381
SusWrite 382
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 23.6
102% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 41.2
98% 200 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 100%
WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB
856GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 108 110 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47% Average
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 111
133% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z3-710 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z3-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback