HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '19 at 11:31
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 384
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 36.5
32% 35.6 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 36.3
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 67 92 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 447
Write 416
Mixed 321
SusWrite 97.7
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 37.6
136% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 177
175% 279 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1333, 1867, 1333, 1867 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback