bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '16 at 05:04
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$183
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 177
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 243
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 97GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
Read 337
Write 137
Mixed 203
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 10.4
31% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 19
DQ Mixed 8.72
9% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 62%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 43GB
20GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 219
Write 160
Mixed 153
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 8.35
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 10.4
33% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 11.2
11% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 78%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
15GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 116
Write 61
Mixed 90.9
107% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.33
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback