Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3260 9,453 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 31.8 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 170 52% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 165 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.19 2% 2.98 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.83 3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 19 29 31 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 1,557 Write 11 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 21.7 288% 402 MB/s	4K Read 428 4K Write 0.2 26,737% 214 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1400, 1400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	42.4% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 11.8 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	36x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	29x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	14x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	22x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	14x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	12x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $281

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16