bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DG33FB
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 18:23
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 55.3
36% 51.2 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 109
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650
Sapphire(174B 0840) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.56
1% 0.88 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500YS-01SHB1 251GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.06C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 31 50 52 45 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 52.3
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 44.3
36% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST3500641AS 500GB-$83
466GB free
Firmware: MX15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 103 101 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 98.6
Write 13.1
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 102
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 33%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22A23T0 320GB
221GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 16 16 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.99% Terrible
Read 30.1
Write 29.7
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 15.5
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.99%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback