Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '16 at 16:22
Run Duration855 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 665
70% 558 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1972) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 60.7
54% 66 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 54.3
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 404
Mixed 412
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 45.1
174% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 98.8
130% 238 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
369GB free
Firmware: MS2OA610 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 141
Write 146
Mixed 121
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.15
67% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 99%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
500GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 88.3
Mixed 81.4
110% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.36
76% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
3GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Read 23.8
Write 5.03
Mixed 7.65
12% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.68
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.006
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 13%
Generic Mass Storage 4GB
3GB free, PID 6200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 4.35
Mixed 6.39
10% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.64
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 1.1
98% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 9%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 5.38
Mixed 7.11
12% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.57
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.01
29% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15
1GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 6.51
Mixed 10.1
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.13
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.03
28% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $898
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback