Acer Veriton M4610G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M4610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4610G
Memory2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime18.8 Days
Run DateOct 01 '19 at 14:31
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 98.1
48% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 156
25% 177 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 0.1 0.3 230 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 399
Write 322
Mixed 342
SusWrite 66.3
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.3
36% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 92%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
87GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 153 110 95 93 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.8% Above average
Read 217
Write 195
Mixed 186
SusWrite 127
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 29.1
102% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 141
121% 178 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 152 152 156 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 147
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 154
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 96%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
118GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 15 19 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 20.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 17
24% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 46%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
266GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 61 75 74 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 74.1
126% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 54%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
28GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 59 75 72 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 106
Write 65
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 71.8
101% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M4610G Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback