Today's hottest deals

Asus P553UJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus P553UJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P553UJ
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190420
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '19 at 18:11
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6198DU
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 120
59% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 234
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 510
Asus(1043 1070) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7158
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 2.97
2% 4.32 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 7.52
4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 361 371 375 362 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 368
Mixed 373
SusWrite 358
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 36.2
128% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 292
236% 333 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 125%
SDXC Card 1TB
987GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 6.7 6.5 1.8 6.1 6.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.7% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 1
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.4
6% 4.95 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 25%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 8GB
7GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.1 3.4 4 4.1 3.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.75% Terrible
Read 28.5
Write 8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
104% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.75%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-004.A00G Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.5% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P553UJ Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P553UJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback