HP 20-r015la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.16%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 20-r015la  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B56
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime35.6 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 06:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6015 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.16% Terrible
Memory 11.9
1-Core 17.8
2-Core 31.1
12% 20.3 Pts
4-Core 24.4
8-Core 36.5
4% 30.5 Pts
64-Core 31.4
2% 31.4 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.16%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2
HP(103C 2B56) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 1.41
1% 1.66 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.04
1% 1.61 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 66 82 89 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 163
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 74.2
68% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.58% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 1.1 GB/s
Latency 387
10% 387 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback