Asrock X570 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 02:03
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$262
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 981
96% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,938
120% 1,938 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
Asus(1043 868A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 110
Parallax 101
90% 107 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 96
Splatting 78.3
82% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,455
Write 1,467
Mixed 1,300
384% 1,741 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 82.6
279% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 928
668% 866 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
ST4000DM001-1FK17N 4TB
23GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 94 91 97 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 85.8
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 91.4
13% 58 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 1.1
7% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 17%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$133
106GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 156 162 163 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 147
Write 154
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 161
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
260% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$124
50GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 94 83 80 85 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$133
2GB free
Firmware: FP1R
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 65.2
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
292% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
27GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3 4.7 3.6 3.4 3.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.8
9% 9.82 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.3
242% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 30.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 26.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 1,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $887
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback