HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EB
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160519
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 22:56
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 102
56% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 201
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 81EB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6518
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 9
Parallax 5.87
5% 6.98 fps
MRender 8.86
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 12.5
8% 8.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
629GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 69 67 76 85 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 82.2
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 72.4
54% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%
KODAK PIXPRO FZ152 16GB
7GB free, PID 0600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.4 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.73% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 1
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 6.2
5% 4.52 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
83% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 20.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback