HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory10.8 GB free of 12.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 17:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 B22
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 82.4
45% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 81.9
8-Core 80.9
11% 81.4 Pts
64-Core 82.5
5% 82.5 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 4.43
4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 67 87 96 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 77.9
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 111 109 107 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 111
Write 59.6
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 109
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 62%
ST325031 0AS 250GB
2GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 7.1 5.5 6.3 6.5 6.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
Read 260
Write 8.2
Mixed 1
SusWrite 6.6
49% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 9E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 ID:02 9E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 45GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback