Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-D2V  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 13:11
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 171
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 312
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 4
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.52
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 106 142 169 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 140
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 126
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
178GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 113 124 126 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 126
Write 123
Mixed 69
SusWrite 123
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 4 3.9 3.8 4.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 24
Write 3.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.9
9% 9.35 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 7%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-75A7B0 640GB
115GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 25 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 26.7
Mixed 27
SusWrite 28
38% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-D2V Builds (Compare 993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback