Asus P5Q DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090710
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '16 at 10:06
Run Duration	674 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 54.8 2-Core 110 53% 83.1 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 217 29% 218 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5870 10,176 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E146) 2GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 29.9 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 27.7 24% 24.6 fps	MRender 14.3 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 20.9 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1700 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1462 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 85 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 85 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 46 46 54303 (EB) Unknown 99 99 75 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6702482265	67.5% Good	Read 373 Write 318 Mixed 333 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 18 105% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 75.8 DQ Mixed 17.7 24% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 124%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$124 1,455 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 376GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 172 6200 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1017 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1590 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 783 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 113 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 904 (C2) HDA temperature 113 103 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 190 257553 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	44.1% Average	Read 74 Write 79.3 Mixed 71.4 56% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.22 91% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 138GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 156 6825 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6175 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7526 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3585 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 258 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6175 (C2) HDA temperature 121 99 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4656 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.4% Poor	Read 53.8 Write 48 Mixed 48.6 38% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.27 90% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 57%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB 6,973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 95GB free Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 66317503 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 10118 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 57 8604798699 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5604 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4419 (B7) Unknown 98 98 2 (B8) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 81605623829 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 504627230 (C2) HDA temperature 30 42 64424509470 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 26 66317503 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 107 11518 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -21930102996086 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5686474 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1922922773	44.2% Average	Read 77.9 Write 76 Mixed 72 57% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.59 117% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 69%
Mass Storage Device 64GB 770 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 27GB free, PID 125d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	7.26% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 9.33 Mixed 10.2 15% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.61 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.01 65% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.26% Great: 18%
USB Mass Storage Device 64GB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 27GB free, PID 168a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.39% Terrible	Read 10.4 Write 7.11 Mixed 6.91 10% 8.14 MB/s	4K Read 2.64 4K Write 0.55 4K Mixed 0.82 56% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.39% Great: 23%
Card 32GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 23GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	7.33% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 7.84 Mixed 12.6 15% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.54 4K Write 0.55 4K Mixed 0.51 53% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.33% Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 12GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 126 Write 8.32 Mixed 8.97 37% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.03 70% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q DELUXE Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q DELUXE

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	71x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	11x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	10x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	6x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	137x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	24x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $459

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16