Gigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '15 at 15:29
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 122
42% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 246
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 35% Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4788
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 53.6
38% 47.3 fps
MRender 56.3
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 39
36% 45.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 511GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 392
Write 233
Mixed 297
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 19.1
67% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 57.6
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 39.4
33% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 58%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 82.4
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.23
96% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 127
Write 127
Mixed 18.1
65% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.48
139% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 76%
Lexar JD FireFly 16GB
11GB free, PID a761
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Read 14
Write 3.75
Mixed 5.71
8% 7.81 MB/s
4K Read 4.46
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
18% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 7%
Typical GA-790XTA-UD4 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback