Founder LENOVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFounder LENOVO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160312
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 12:36
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 186
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 544
56% 449 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 362F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 5.91
4% 8.95 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 11.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000DX001-SSHD-8GB 2TB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 171 180 183 185 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 194
Mixed 29
SusWrite 172
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 14.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback