Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S752 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB23F
Memory	0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120524
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '19 at 12:34
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 84.5 1-Core 60.2 2-Core 97.4 53% 80.7 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 148 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HEJ423232H9E300 320GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: F6BOA180 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 37 35 32 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 49.2 Write 36.3 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 31.1 25% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.1 32% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 35%
ASMT 2115 160GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 123GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 88 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 87.6 Write 82.7 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 87.6 101% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 2x2GB 1,373 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 6.6 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	124x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
Series SATA SSD 120GBVBench 63%, 3,411 samples	3x
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	13x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 4,546 samples	7x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	4x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $227