ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1781

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Micro-Star GT72 2QE
Motherboard	MSI MS-1781 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150604
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '19 at 23:04
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GEO-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5700HQ 14,004 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 229 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 583 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% MSI(1462 1129) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Lighting 50.1 Reflection 55.3 Parallax 49.2 41% 51.5 fps	MRender 60.7 Gravity 52.2 Splatting 51.8 45% 54.9 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3310A 128GB 1,122 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20001P00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 158 146 141 127 131 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.9% Good	Read 180 Write 198 Mixed 262 SusWrite 159 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 87.6 4K Mixed 28.7 124% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 232 200% 298 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 92%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 114GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 96 93 82 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 70.5 Write 73.3 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 92.1 46% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 75%
FUJITSU MHY2250BH 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 117GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.2% Very poor	Read 23.5 Write 21.8 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 28.8 31% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 17%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 642 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 33GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 99 108 119 119 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 58.2 Write 107 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 106 128% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 2x8GB 4,507 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.8 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-1781 Builds (Compare 380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1781

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	164x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	133x
Core i7-5700HQIntelBench 69%, 14,004 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	149x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	127x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	28x

SSD
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	64x
HG6 SATA M.2 128GBToshibaBench 76%, 5,880 samples	47x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	32x

RAM
MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 4,507 samples	51x
MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,392 samples	35x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback