Lenovo 20235

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20235  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '16 at 12:28
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 86.8
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 106
55% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 154
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3800) 746MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4101
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.96
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$85
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 61
Write 59
Mixed 62.8
46% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.23
72% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 63%
Maxtor 6 E040L0 41GB
1GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.7% Terrible
Read 39.5
Write 6.58
Mixed 9.09
17% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.25
26% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (86th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20235 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20235

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback