Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '16 at 22:54
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 142
60% 99 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 432
40% 337 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7563
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.44
3% 4.18 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.04
3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 500
Write 392
Mixed 419
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 32.1
107% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 57.1
58% 95.3 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
737GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 155
Mixed 152
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.35
114% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
172GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 84.6
Mixed 75.9
63% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.41
100% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 68%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
21GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 104
Write 113
Mixed 94.3
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.27
94% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 83%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
212GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3.74
2% 3.74 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 49%
ST932032 5AS 320GB
192GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Read 16.8
Write 14.1
Mixed 15.5
20% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.29
37% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A01LF 99U5471-057.A00LF 99U5458-005.A01LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback