Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '19 at 23:06
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Memory 87.4 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 571 8-Core 903 91% 737 Pts	64-Core 1,105 68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 75.4 Reflection 78.2 Parallax 67.3 61% 73.6 fps	MRender 72.1 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 73.5 59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 388 383 392 394 393 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 475 Mixed 309 SusWrite 389 94% 421 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 52.7 188% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 286 231% 328 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 147GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 136 91 88 96 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 497 Write 445 Mixed 334 SusWrite 146 79% 356 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 41.1 148% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 180 167% 259 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 144GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,183 Write 7,709 Mixed 7,811 1,765% 7,901 MB/s	4K Read 651 4K Write 330 4K Mixed 417 1,696% 466 MB/s	DQ Read 1818 DQ Write 1,284 DQ Mixed 1,341 1,058% 1,481 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 420GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 137 135 135 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 140 Write 101 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 135 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 502GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 78 79 77 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 116 Write 100 Mixed 45.7 SusWrite 76.7 62% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 468GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 126 126 128 125 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 129 Write 99 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 124 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB 1,628 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 35.8 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 25.6 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 34.9 81% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)