Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer CH20
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 14:38
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 653
70% 554 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7000
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 131
Parallax 7.41
6% 48.3 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 557 551 531 513 497 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,939
Write 1,373
Mixed 1,168
SusWrite 553
280% 1,258 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 53.2
180% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 1,186
DQ Mixed 977
747% 997 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 212%
Great: 296%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
726GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 174 177 175 177 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 165
Write 168
Mixed 114
SusWrite 173
210% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
131% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 175 178 176 178 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 188
Write 188
Mixed 110
SusWrite 175
221% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
127% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 70%
WDC WD10 EARX-22N0YB0 1TB
486GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.3 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
Read 88
Write 89.5
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 3
78% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.13 MB/s
WDC WD10 EARX-22N0YB0 1TB
812GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 3.6 0.8 1.2 0.5 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.2% Poor
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 77
SusWrite 3.6
102% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 24.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback