Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '19 at 06:02
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 263
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 737
74% 600 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 119
Parallax 102
86% 109 fps
MRender 99.9
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 105
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 95 56 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 461
Mixed 374
SusWrite 96.2
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 60.3
217% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 52
124% 258 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
23GB free
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 312 232 177 161 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 404
Write 229
Mixed 241
SusWrite 208
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 23.2
95% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 24.1
62% 136 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 76%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 333 319 319 318 318 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 425
Mixed 384
SusWrite 310
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 56.7
216% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 55.5
126% 261 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
772GB free
Firmware: N100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 390 380 392 389 389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 370
Mixed 298
SusWrite 362
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 36.9
156% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 35
95% 202 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.3
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 37.4
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 23
Write 19.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 17.9
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 37
Write 36.3
Mixed 28
SusWrite 37
47% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
736GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 9.1 10 8.5 8.6 9.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 132
Write 120
Mixed 70
SusWrite 12.2
103% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 50%
WDC WD75 00AACS-00ZJB0 750GB
106GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 61 62 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 65.5
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 61.2
81% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $859
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback