| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160505 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 17 '19 at 11:34 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.4%
Above average
|
58% 92.1 Pts
|
32% 263 Pts
|
20% 324 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.3%
Below average
|
30% 35.5 fps
|
30% 36.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 13 43 1.8 1.8 66 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
25% 112 MB/s
|
44% 13.5 MB/s
|
14% 17.9 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
203GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 143 143 143 144 136 MB/s
|
79.4%
Very good
|
77% 106 MB/s
|
132% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
WDC WD10 JPVX-08JC3T5 1TB
601GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
7.26%
Terrible
|
20% 14.2 MB/s
|
28% 0.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.9%
Average
|
46% 16.3 GB/s
|
25% 8.83 GB/s
|
55% 73.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LX3 Builds (Compare 1,346 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX3 - $147
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 538x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 207x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 152x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 180x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 107x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 75x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $324 |