PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170607 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 15 '19 at 23:17 |
Run Duration | 200 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 250GB-$90
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 190 201 203 201 204 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
276GB free
Firmware: CP10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 75 72 70 73 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 182 193 191 192 190 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
847GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 70 67 60 65 MB/s
|
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
|
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 431x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |