Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67A-UD3-B3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120321
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 23:46
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 361
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 18.1
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 22
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung RBX Series 64GB M
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VAM05D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 51 52 51 57 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 94.7
Write 26.5
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 49.4
12% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 8.9
41% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 119 111 112 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 118
Write 130
Mixed 55
SusWrite 114
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 70%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
57GB free
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 111 103 104 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 143
Write 134
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 106
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.5
285% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 111%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 04.05G07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 53 53 51 57 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 134
Write 126
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 51.2
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.3
259% 2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 79%
Maxtor OneTouch 320GB
0GB free, PID 7350
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.7
Write 16
Mixed 12.7
17% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 128GB
111GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.5 5.6 4 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 4.2
7% 6 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 16%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
7GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 7.3
Mixed 10
SusWrite 11.2
15% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 8%
Toshiba External USB HDD 500GB
281GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 29
Mixed 26
SusWrite 22.2
36% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 20%
HITACHI_ DK14FA-15D 16GB
14GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.34% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 13.8
Mixed 14
SusWrite 13.9
20% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 0.4 MB/s
Generic- SD/MMC 4GB
0GB free, PID 8468
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.5
Write 5
Mixed 5.3
10% 9.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
104% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 13%
Generic- MicroSD/M2 4GB
4GB free, PID 8468
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.85% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 5.3
Mixed 5
SusWrite 6.3
8% 6.82 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 9%
SAMSUNG HM020GI 20GB
19GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.1% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 29.8
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 31.4
39% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67A-UD3-B3 Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback