PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120321 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 12 '19 at 23:46 |
Run Duration | 274 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
77.3%
Very good
|
75% 128 Pts
|
48% 358 Pts
|
22% 361 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
16% 20.6 fps
|
19% 23.3 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung RBX Series 64GB M
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VAM05D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 51 52 51 57 58 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
12% 52.6 MB/s
|
41% 10.7 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 119 111 112 117 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
76% 104 MB/s
|
224% 1.67 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
57GB free
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 111 103 104 107 MB/s
|
71.5%
Very good
|
85% 116 MB/s
|
285% 2.17 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 04.05G07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 53 53 51 57 61 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
73% 98.8 MB/s
|
259% 2 MB/s
|
|
![]() Maxtor OneTouch 320GB
0GB free, PID 7350
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
17% 12.5 MB/s
|
52% 0.6 MB/s
|
||
![]() SanDisk Cruzer Glide 128GB
111GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.5 5.6 4 3.6 3.7 MB/s
|
3.98%
Terrible
|
7% 6 MB/s
|
20% 1 MB/s
|
|
![]() Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
7GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 12 11 12 12 MB/s
|
6.66%
Terrible
|
15% 11.9 MB/s
|
22% 2 MB/s
|
|
![]() Toshiba External USB HDD 500GB
281GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 22 22 23 MB/s
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
36% 27.4 MB/s
|
57% 0.73 MB/s
|
|
![]() |
7.34%
Terrible
|
20% 14.5 MB/s
|
32% 0.4 MB/s
|
|
![]() Generic- SD/MMC 4GB
0GB free, PID 8468
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
10% 9.6 MB/s
|
104% 2.53 MB/s
|
||
![]() Generic- MicroSD/M2 4GB
4GB free, PID 8468
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.2 MB/s
|
3.85%
Terrible
|
8% 6.82 MB/s
|
14% 1.3 MB/s
|
|
![]() SAMSUNG HM020GI 20GB
19GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 31 31 31 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
39% 28.1 MB/s
|
70% 0.8 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
58.4%
Above average
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
65% 61.3 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 71x |
Core i7-2600Intel $82Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 61x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 45x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 16x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $405 |