To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080328
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '19 at 17:22
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 61.4 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 54.9 33% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 108 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 3771) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 38.7 Parallax 49.5 34% 43.3 fps	MRender 54.2 Gravity 48.7 Splatting 36 37% 46.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Liteonit LAT-256M2S 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: PND9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 68 76 77 81 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 19% Great: 35%
Seagate ST316081 2AS Q 160GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 5GB free Firmware: 3.BQ SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 53 46 46 47 51 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 44.5 Write 43.7 Mixed 35 SusWrite 48.1 32% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 31%
Hitachi HTS542560K9SA00 60GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 29GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 30.3 Mixed 21 SusWrite 17.8 33% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 19%
HLDS Inc SuperMulti RW 60GB 14GB free, PID 1640 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 20 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.3% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 27.8 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 19.5 32% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 2.3 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	725x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	285x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	273x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	624x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	138x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	308x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397