HP p6616f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP p6616f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 00:45
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 830
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 82.1
45% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 162
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Diamond(1092 5450) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
531GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 92 90 87 98 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 108
Write 85.8
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 90
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57%
Great: 65%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-00A23T0 320GB
231GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.7% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 23.4
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 24
31% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA160B.C8FE Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6616f Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6616f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback