Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '19 at 22:18
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 249
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 843
80% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,942
120% 1,942 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 131
Parallax 116
98% 122 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 122
Splatting 100
89% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,485
Write 2,316
Mixed 1754
486% 2185 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 76.7
256% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 779
570% 754 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 750GB
540GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 104 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 108
Write 89
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 104
109% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 41%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback