Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 09KPNV
Memory	18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110420
Uptime	10.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '19 at 15:56
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3670 1,878 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 171 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 506 52% 422 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 86%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 256GB 2,811 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 195 195 195 131 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 91 Write 199 Mixed 149 SusWrite 179 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 9.8 36% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 18.7 DQ Mixed 15.6 13% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 55%
SABRENT 240GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 206GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 18 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 29.5 Write 26.3 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 24.5 36% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 5.1 370% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 293%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 17.3 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 10 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $374