MSI B350M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A38
MotherboardMSI B350M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38)  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 02 '19 at 20:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 208
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 631
62% 509 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 31
Parallax 29.9
20% 28.6 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 33.8
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 8.6 78 37 188 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 442
Write 358
Mixed 294
SusWrite 117
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 14.7
46% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 41.7
48% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
75GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 32
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 93
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 14.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38) Builds (Compare 1,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI B350M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38) - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback