O.e.m O.E.M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardO.e.m O.E.M  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130914
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 15:59
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User LBY-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 364
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 37.3
32% 35.7 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 36.1
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 167 55 43 91 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 210
Write 52.2
Mixed 108
SusWrite 98.3
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 29.2
100% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 34.5
30% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9DEPBOZE-TATP 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical O.E.M Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: O.e.m O.E.M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback