Today's hottest deals

HP Pro x2 410 G1 PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro x2 410 G1 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21F0
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '16 at 15:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4202Y
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 27.3
1-Core 13.7
2-Core 33.7
16% 24.9 Pts
4-Core 91.5
8-Core 112
13% 102 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)
HP(103C 21F0) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3621
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 1.93
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 2.62
2% 2.39 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 3.83
2% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB-$72
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231306 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 375
Write 280
Mixed 298
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 7.59
39% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45.2
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 30.8
26% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 13.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro x2 410 G1 PC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro x2 410 G1 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback