Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151016
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 18 '16 at 14:05
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 194
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 318
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.13.142
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10PURX-64E5EY0 1TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 127
Write 152
Mixed 142
106% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.51
4K Mixed 0.24
110% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB
4GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 4.85
Mixed 5.98
9% 8.83 MB/s
4K Read 3.66
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.007
14% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLLG42F-D8KBGG------ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback