Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '19 at 15:58
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 291
101% 182 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 883
87% 714 Pts
64-Core 882
55% 882 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 125
Parallax 103
91% 113 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 104
Splatting 111
87% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 483 485 438 425 388 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 449
Mixed 388
SusWrite 437
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 59.4
201% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 151 151 150 153 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 146
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 151
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 139 137 137 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 137
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79%
Great: 84%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 249GB
156GB free, PID 4000, PNY 256GB Elite SDXC
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 80 80 79 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
Read 88.1
Write 76.3
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 79
103% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 4.1
274% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 35.1
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 34.2
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 49.1
81% 49.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 112%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback