Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 14:46
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 600
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 18
Parallax 28
17% 22.3 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 23
Splatting 21.3
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32TNF-N3A0A 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 138 139 145 159 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 491
Write 314
Mixed 352
SusWrite 148
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 44.6
152% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 161
128% 182 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
419GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 110
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 84.7
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E 640GB
596GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 97 100 99 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
Read 96.3
Write 96.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 98.9
116% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 29.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.4
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback