Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0 2,020 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 74.5 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 147 59% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 247 36% 265 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 131 106 125 99 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 300 Write 231 Mixed 138 SusWrite 125 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 30.6 102% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 98.2 DQ Mixed 43.9 40% 59 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 296GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 112 113 112 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 65 Write 66.8 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 111 52% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GLK72V6H 2x8GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.9% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	500x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	309x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	264x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	57x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373