To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080730
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 13:26
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 27
2-Core 54.3
35% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 108
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 2GB
CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 16.5
16% 17 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.4
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 135 56 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 258
Write 226
Mixed 205
SusWrite 94.7
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 27.4
108% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 136
115% 167 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
149GB free
Firmware: ST1OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 104
Write 106
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 107
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
BUFFALO USB Flash Disk 1GB
0GB free, PID 0114
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 2.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.6
7% 6.25 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback