Gigabyte GA-B360M D2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B360M-D2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M D2V  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 12:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 423
52% 395 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 82.3
56% 71.5 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 68
Splatting 53.9
50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DSS240-S535D 240GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 37 51 38 8.4 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 461
Write 387
Mixed 348
SusWrite 71.2
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 67.5
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 0.8
10% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M D2V Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M D2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback