Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H77M

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H77M (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130809
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '19 at 11:49
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	67%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 176 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 324 42% 318 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.4% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 61.3 Parallax 74.9 47% 64.6 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 59.2 Splatting 54.7 48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Revuahn 900T Pro 512GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 315GB free (System drive) Firmware: AG0411D SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 315 346 381 378 376 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 445 Write 385 Mixed 247 SusWrite 349 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 21.2 65% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 200 155% 209 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 97%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 88GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 241 250 260 260 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 377 Write 265 Mixed 265 SusWrite 252 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 16.1 52% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 182 164% 250 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$85 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 181GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 82 84 78 67 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 91 Write 100 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 79.5 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 8325 FLGF65F-D8KMB 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 14.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 14.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	58x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	47x
Core i5-3570KIntel $80Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	35x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	31x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $568

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $296	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350