Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 23:38
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,160
105% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,528
95% 1,528 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 152
Parallax 139
110% 142 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 140
Splatting 112
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 469 464 468 451 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 474
Mixed 353
SusWrite 466
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 53.3
178% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 351
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
4TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 185 186 186 193 191 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
807GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 176 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 170
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 175
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
240% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
419GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 159 159 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 87
SusWrite 158
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 109%
I-O DATA HDCL-UT 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 014a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 144 142 146 146 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 97
Write 137
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 143
161% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
195% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 62%
Logitec LHR USB Device 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0225
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 150 152 150 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.5% Good
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 150
184% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.57 MB/s
BUFFALO BSCR20TU3 -SD 32GB
14GB free, PID 0278
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 48 44 53 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.6% Below average
Read 88.5
Write 47.7
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 48.4
72% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 5
314% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.4% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,077
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback