Today's hottest deals

Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemIntel SandyBridge Platform
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 01:29
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 172
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 335
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Palit(1569 0F00) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 334.89
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 3.38
4% 4.38 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 3.43
4% 4.45 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel MegaSR 478GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 395 106 117 131 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 496
Write 422
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 190
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 26.8
90% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 90.9
132% 242 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 81%
Intel MegaSR 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 356 239 254 251 212 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Intel MegaSR 999GB
930GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 194 196 208 195 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 143
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 190
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-018.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback