| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20110615 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 11 '19 at 06:32 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 82% |
| CPU Throttled | 80% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
16% 26.7 Pts
|
7% 53.9 Pts
|
6% 94 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Sanyo(144D C581) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.14%
Terrible
|
1% 1.33 fps
|
2% 2.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 5.2 97 107 123 110 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
25% 109 MB/s
|
51% 17.8 MB/s
|
55% 106 MB/s
|
|
Generic External 500GB
348GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 17 18 19 MB/s
|
9.07%
Terrible
|
21% 16.1 MB/s
|
38% 0.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBSQ 8GB
1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
13% 4.43 GB/s
|
7% 2.37 GB/s
|
13% 318 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 Builds (Compare 167 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 54x |
| Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples | 36x |
| Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples | 31x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 131x |
| GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 35x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |