Sony SVP13217PHB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVP13217PHB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '15 at 17:33
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 116
45% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 63.7
8-Core 47.3
8% 55.5 Pts
64-Core 54.8
3% 54.8 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sony(104D 90B6) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3316
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 1.16
1% 2.73 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM6401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 929
Write 670
Mixed 754
174% 784 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 13.4
64% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.5
DQ Write 53.6
DQ Mixed 13.7
18% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 160%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61% Good
Read 155
Write 146
Mixed 123
178% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61%
Great: 56%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
757GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 119
Write 101
Mixed 96.2
132% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.23
75% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 56%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00V1A0 500GB
466GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
Read 137
Write 134
Mixed 89.6
150% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.35
63% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 75.9
Write 15.6
Mixed 15.5
33% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.39
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.78
83% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 39%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback