Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MD71-HB0-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory224GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 224GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MD71-HB0-00  (all builds)
Memory219.2 GB free of 224 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6152
CPU0, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 834
76% 635 Pts
64-Core 2,398
148% 2,398 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 7.62
5% 6.89 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB480G6K 480GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G201CS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 407 412 420 424 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 328
Write 422
Mixed 298
SusWrite 415
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 32.5
117% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 240
182% 246 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 96%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
26GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 101
Mixed 109
140% 112 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.5
238% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 14x16GB
14 of 16 slots used
224GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 67
MC Mixed 51
156% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 130%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback