Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110420
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJul 03 '19 at 09:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 180
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 359
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 19.7
19% 19.3 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 19.9
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 61 59 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 255
Write 115
Mixed 155
SusWrite 66.3
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 21.6
84% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 81.3
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 83.6
68% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 73%
Seagate ST3500514NS 500GB-$50
360GB free
Firmware: SN12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 99.8
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 105
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 75%
Generic External 200GB
98GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 37.3
46% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-437.A01LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback