Lenovo 80QB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80QB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo E51-80
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '19 at 12:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 155
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 237
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 382A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4627
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 6.06
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 13.5
8% 9.06 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 280
Mixed 244
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 24.1
90% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 45.8
DQ Mixed 26.4
22% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80QB Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80QB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback