Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KJ382AA-ABA m9250f (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	19.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '19 at 01:49
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44 6,294 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 59.5 36% 52.6 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 115 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 3.92 Parallax 4.16 4% 4.14 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6 4% 4.62 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 168 147 140 149 145 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.4% Good	Read 243 Write 228 Mixed 223 SusWrite 157 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 32.7 106% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 188 138% 181 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB-$67 5,838 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 192GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 202 204 216 217 218 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.4% Above average	Read 241 Write 232 Mixed 212 SusWrite 207 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 31.2 97% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 144 110% 146 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 121%
SABRENT 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2TB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.7% Poor	Read 53.5 Write 43.8 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 38.2 61% 46 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.4 100% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $44Bench 44%, 6,294 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	1x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	3x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16