PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP (all builds) |
Memory | 22.6 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120904 |
Uptime | 12.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 30 '19 at 16:36 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
69.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 241 254 251 251 251 MB/s
|
71%
Very good
|
|||
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
127GB free
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 147 362 221 134 135 MB/s
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$32
201GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 101 99 101 100 MB/s
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
75GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
|
9.91%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
40.9%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 85x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 71x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 52x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 33x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 30x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $761 |