Today's hottest deals

Asus X555LD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X555LD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LD
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140814
Uptime71.3 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 21:04
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 132
62% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 188
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 16CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 4.31
3% 4.77 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 6.83
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST640LM001 HN-M640MBB 640GB
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 91 82 91 92 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 89.4
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 86.7
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LD Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback